Comparison Of Management Structure Between Ford Foundation And Heifer International

IntroductionThe purpose of this is to comp ar management structure of two non-profit organizations , that is to vocalize Heifer world(prenominal) and Ford establishment1 . Heifer internationalist11 . get on with of theater directorsThe most important strategical decisions at Heifer International are taken by the hop on of directors , which unites obligation Agency representatives international representatives and representatives from Heifer International initiation . agreement Agencies stand for in the control board of Directors include National Catholic Rural Life Conference , Presbyterian Hunger Program , church building service of the Brethren , Episcopal Relief and instruction and saviourian Church (Disciples of delivery boy , while the regional composition features Regional Representatives from Africa , North t he States , Asia / sec Pacific , Mid-West , important Eastern Europe eastern , southeastern , Central , Northwest and Southwest regions . The board of Directors is presided upon by a Chair who is , in turn , assisted by a frailness-Chair (Heifer International , 20071 .2 . decision shaping machine management , senior(a) feebleness prexy of cosmos Building , Senior fault chairwoman of maturement , Senior transgression chair of communications and merchandising strategical aggroup also includes Director of Internal Communications Director of Finance , Director of Strategy and Operational transmit Director of Communications , Director of Marketing , Director of attainment Centers , Board Liaison /Assistant to the chairman , feebleness chairman of engineering science /CIO , Vice chairman of Human Resources , Vice President of advocacy , Vice President of Organizational outgrowth , Vice President of Education , Vice President of the Americas , Vice President of Ce ntral Eastern /Europe , Vice President of As! ia /South Pacific and Vice President of Africa Day-to-day management is through with(p) at the level of Country area Offices , U .S . Field Offices and U .S . Regional Offices (Heifer International , 20071 .3 . Corporate CultureAs for the corporate last and HR practices , it s possible to infer that the organization actively embraces team philosophical system . It s also concerned with gender equality at all in all levels of management structure President and CEO , Senior Vice President of Development and Senior Vice President of Institution Building are female many women are represented in the Board of Directors and Strategic Team (Heifer International 2007 .

human race opinion about the organization is good : in 2004 Heifer International received the prestigious Hilton Prize for its contribution to the clear of meliorate the conditions of people living in developing countries (Conrad N . Hilton can , 20042 . Ford Foundation2 .1 . Board of TrusteesFord Foundation is governed by a Board of Trustees which set policies concerning such issues as finance , investiture , appointment making , management professional standards , and geographic cerebrate . To accomplish these functions , Committees of the Board of Trustees exist , namely Audit decision maker , enthronization , Management and Governance , Membership , Program legate and Transactions Committees . Similarly to Heifer International the Board of Trustees aims at being representative in geographical sense : ten note members are U .S . citizens while others come from different countries (Ford Foundation , 20071 .2 . executive direc tor managementExecutive management is performed by Of! ficers , namely President Executive Vice President , Secretary , and General Counsel Vice President fro Communications Vice President and Chief enthronisation Officer Vice President for Knowledge , Creativity and freedom Vice President for Asset Building and Community Development Vice President for Peace and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper