Genophilosophy Essay -- Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Geno ismABSTRACT Contemporary progress in life sciences, curiously in genetic engineering, is changing our concept of kind being and a whole series of other philosophical and common nonions. The conventional liking of subject will no longer be the final interview for philosophical thinking, since even the subject qua biological or psychological social structure will enjoy a high degree of unpredictability. The results of gene engineering science require reinterpreting such concepts as reproduction, individuality, history, freedom and subjectivity. This paper focuses on the app bent movement of freedom, where freedom means the capacity to deliberate and choose between dissimilar alternatives of action. We hold that the issue of freedom is relevant for genetics. Considering that genes can decide between alternatives, it is possible to speak about the freedom of genes, at least in a metaphoric sense. It has been suggested that genes are more free than compassionate beings bec ause they encoded us. The human genome program thus helps us to study what kind of structures human beings are dependent upon. The main question that we address in this paper concerns the replete(p) human genome project and all its implications including the functions and effects of each gene, the possibility of expert manipulation, what kind of freedom, history, and human being will eventually survive. Recent developments in molecular biology and genetic engineering are going to deepen our human being concept and a whole series of other philosophical and common notions, such as knowledge, subject, ego, history, past, science, ethics, etc. The traditional subject of subject wont be any more the only final file name extension of philosophical thinking, si... ...philosophy ? a higher speed mutant of ancient flake philosophy ? should prevail with a main task to investigate and understand the consequences of these brand-new technologies and to represent it in scientific, soci al and ethical debates. Similar to when Kant urged philosophers in the eighteenth century to turn towards humans, now there is a privation to turn towards genes. In continuous dialogs and partnerships with life scientists and politicians, philosophers have to develop new merits of freedom, person and evolution and to investigate the possible ways of improving human life on earth. We have to remember on the pragmatic adage, if philosophy and science lack social fruits in the long run, then it does not deserve the attention of the society. On the other hand, if the science and society do not open up for philosophical deliberations, it can have fantastic consequences.