Procter & Gamble Rely Tampons Case Study Essay -- essays research pape

AbstractThe purpose of this research paper is that to present the difficulties Procter & adventure faced in the early 1980s due to a correlational statistics between the companys Rely tampon and the disease hepatotoxic Shock Syndrome (TSS). Also, how the company handled the findings before and after new laws were passed by coition giving the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the authority to regulate medical checkup devices, which included tampons. Thereafter, I testament analyze the ethical issues relevant to this oddball within a SWOT analysis. IntroductionCorporate Social debt instrument (CSR) is nearly how companies manage their business processes to produce a positive preserve on society. Companies introduce new proceedss in markets, usually after examen concludes that the product is safe for use or consumption. It is nearly impossible for a company to truly know all of the potential risks a imperfection new product may have, even after thorough testing. However, in one case a company receives reports that its product may be causing victimize to consumers, it is their responsibility to assume more research and tests to rule-out any possible true statement in the reports. This is what a socially responsible company would do, one who is negligent not only with their bottom-line, but one that is also worried about its customers. After Procter & Gamble introduced its Rely tampon in the market in the 1970s, the company began receiving reports as early as 1975 that the product was causing a rare but possibly deadly disease, TSS ( poisonous Shock Syndrome). This product was not make with cotton as the competitors tampons. The Rely tampon was made with synthetics, like carboxymethylcellulose and polyester in order to be the offset extended gestate and most absorbent tampon in the market. I ordain first discuss these reports and what the companys initial response was. Next, I will elaborate on the case and the companys course of legal action following the passing of new laws and further research conducted by the shopping centre for Disease Control (CDC), the illnesses and the women affected by these decisions. Following, I will conduct a SWOT Analysis of the company in which I will include relevant ethic theories pertaining to the case. Finally, I will conclude and allow for recommendations based on my findings.Company HistoryWilliam Procter, who emigrated from England, and James Gamble, who emigrated from Ireland, met... ...er menstruation or any accidents.Referenceswww.pg.com/translations/history_pdf/english_history.pdfhttp//finance.yahoo.com/q/pr?s=PGhttp//www.hoovers.com/gillette/--ID__10655--/free-co-factsheet.xhtmlhttp//sev.prnewswire.com/retail/20041209/CLTH02809122004-1.htmlhttp//www.pg.com/content/pdf/04_news/agl_2004_shareholders_speech.pdfhttp//www.mum.org./relyart7.htmhttp//www.citizen.org/congress/civjus/ civil wrong/articles.cfm?ID=802Armand, Lione, Kapecki, Jon. 1975. Testing plugs in Rochester just w hat can you Rely on? Jul23-Aug5. Rochester Patriot. Vol.3, No.14Meadows, Michelle. 2000. Tampon Safety, TSS Now Rare, but Women Still Should Take Care. March-April. FDA Consumer Magazine. http//www.fda.gov/fdac/features/2000/200_tss.htmlKlein, Joel MD. 2004. Toxic Shock Syndrome. Nemours run agroundation. January, 2004. http//kidshealth.org/PageManager.jsp?dn=KidsHealth&lic=1&ps=207&cat_id=20015&article_set=20277Foote, Susan B. 1984. Corporate responsibility in a changing legal environment. California Management Review. Spring. V.26, p. 217-228.Hostman, Barry M. 2000. Author Found a Web of Paranoia, Secrecy 01March. The Cincinnati Post.