The Name of War Essay -- Essays Papers

The Name of WarIn this historical and cultur all in ally divided book, Jill Lepore examines and tries to define the poof Philips War and how people wrote round it. At the beginning of the colonies it was a start of a New England and after the King Philips War with all of the religious conflicts and warfare stories, a impudently American identity was born. Throughout this book she tells gruesome tales about murders, massacres, and battles. steady thought his book jumps a lot in chronically frame she successfully tells the tales for both sides pretty accurately. I enjoyed reading some move of this book. Especially the beginning and the middle because I thought the End dropped take out and slowed d hold. Starting even before the war begins, she tells the tale of John Sassamon which she uses as the basis of ideas. This is a center point of the first part of her book. wherefore Sassamon was either killed for no antecedent or assassinated? New England Indians at the time were to b ecome accustom to English goods and some were even converting to Christianity. concisely after the war begins she shows how the Indians use Christianity as a part of their war. overly after the war begins she writes about how many writers try to capture the war in words so that the colonies dont loose their Englishness. This is ironic because by toilsome not to loose their Englishness they form an American identity.Inside the John Sassamon written report lays the true reason why he was killed. Sassamon was an educated man, which was rattling obsolete considering he was a autochthonal American. Even though he was suppuration apart from some of his friends in the colonies he still had strong ties with them. at that place are many reasons why he would be killed but none as strong as turning on your own people. traitorousness is considered a great offence to our country, imagine the offence taken by the Native Americans. Reading this book I found great similarities with the Na tive American culture and one with a gang or a mob family. All of them seem to have great penalties for one of their own turning against them. The major difference would be that the Native Americans godliness was likewise a great deal of their culture. A mob familys religion (catholic or instance) would conflict with the killing of another human. But the Native Americans were not that way, if one was killed and they took hostages then the one killed could be revenged by killing a hostage.... ...re not doing any of the torturing and only watching they dont loose their ties with the mother land. This was completely wrong, the Colonists were there not the English. The English efficiency have read about it somewhere in a composition or a book but the Colonists had to live through it. This is the reason why the Colonists lost their Englishness and began a new American identity.Lepore also utilize writers of that time to distinguish between how they told their truth and what she thou ght was the truth. This was a real useful part of the book, it showed to us the reader, that not all the stories that we read about the in history books or books from that time are entirely correct. That in every writing there is some type of biases ness. She did a very good job on representing both sides very well.This book was the watch of war and how people wrote about it. But also the book makes it plain clear that this was the start of a new American identity. Throughout the writings, stories, and all of the religious battles that were fought one true thing remained the colonists Englishness was gone. This was not New England any more this was something new. This was a New New England.